【新唐人2012年1月28日讯】今年央视春晚依然是恶评如潮。之前多位大牌明星退出春晚，直播当晚明星集体走调，这些依然是坊间街头议论的话题。最近，又有网友披露，春晚涉及四大“盗版”节目，而无缘春晚的郭德纲，也因此曲线上了一把春晚。
2012年央视春晚刚结束，就有网友微博发帖爆料，由郭冬临主演的小品《超市面试》，涉嫌抄袭日本搞笑组合UNJASH的小品《打工面试》，从设定、结构到包袱几乎都一样。
《超市面试》和《打工面试》同样讲的是一家超市店长，把前来应聘的人误会为小偷的故事。两个小品中应聘者都有五年的工作经验，并且，应聘者都梦想着拥有一家自己的超市。
郭冬临回应抄袭门则说：“这事应该问中央电视台，问他们是怎么回事。”
歌星韩庚也陷入“抄袭门”。他与“年”兽打斗的表演，炫目的舞台设计，配合韩庚大玩双节棍，眼花缭乱的动作，确实抢眼。
不过，马上有网友发现，韩庚的节目，与美国明星碧昂斯的新专辑歌曲《run the world》的表演，相似度达到90%。此外，还有网友贴出一段来自日本某综艺节目的“光影舞”视频，韩庚的表演也与此相似。
一直无缘参加春晚的郭德纲，这次却意外“曲线”上了春晚。在冯巩和牛莉表演的相声剧《爱的代驾》中，有一段对白，冯巩问“你有病啊”，牛莉作答“你有药啊”，被发现源自郭德纲和于谦表演的相声《你有病》。
“你有病啊？
你有药啊？
你吃多少？
你有多少？
你有多少吃多少？
你吃多少有多少？”
对烧钱2个亿的春晚，居然出现两个严重抄袭造假的节目，网友感到愤怒，呼吁抵制“春晚二手货，拒绝央视春晚！”
网友质问，如果，UNJASH要求央视支付小品《打工面试》巨额的版权费，央视将如何面对？如果打起官司又将有何颜面？
《南方都市报》署名朱永华的文章说，整台春晚完全靠华丽的灯光来渲染，春晚越来越像是一座忽悠全国观众的形象工程。
春晚造假早有前科。“假唱”的传闻一直不断。连主持人念出的一份份来自中国各地的所谓“贺电”，也被网友曝光是造假的。
大陆诗人、文化批评家叶匡政还发现，今年春晚的主持人连说话都不自信，是历年表现最差的。
大陆诗人、文化批评家叶匡政：“他们连他们自己都不相信他们所讲的一些话了，当一个主持人不相信自己所说的话了，他必然没有激情，必然无法影响观众，必然你在下面看到，感到主持人讲话非常虚假。”
来自《红网》的文章认为，春晚多数剧本的创作，出自于一些所谓的“御用”之手，他们不仅把持了演员本人，甚至还垄断了一些演出和节目制作。抄袭造假事件的频频发生，正是这些“御用”之手创作力枯竭后的无耻之举。
新唐人记者李静、王明宇综合报导。
CCTV’s New Year Gala Involved in Four Plagiarisms
Predictably, the 2012 China Central Television’s (CCTV)
New Year Gala received bad reviews.
People are discussing the several big stars, who quit the gala,
and the off-key song in the show.
Recently, netizens revealed that CCTV’s gala was involved
in four plagiarisms.
Therefore Guo Degang who never had the chance to appear
in the gala got a chance “indirectly” this time.
Shortly after the 2012 CCTV New Year Gala, some netizens
revealed on a Microblog about possible plagiarism.
The sketch, ‘Interview in a Supermarket’, starring
Guo Donglin, ‘
might have plagiarized the sketch of a Japanese
comedy group UNJASH, called Interview for a Job.
It’s similarities spanned from design and structure
to punch lines.
Both “Interview in a Supermarket” and “Interview for a Job”
describe a supermarket manager.
In these sketches, the manager mistook an interviewee for
a thief.
In both sketches, the interviewees had five year’s work
experience and dreamed of opening up a supermarket.
Guo Donglin replied to the suspicion: You should ask CCTV
about what’s going on.
A singer, Han Geng, was also involved in a plagiarism
scandal.
His performance fighting with the Nien beast, with nunchaku
skills, and dazzling stage design, was eye-catching.
Netizens discovered Han Geng’s performance was 90% like
American singer Beyonce’s new song “Run the World.”
Some netizens shared a video of “Light and Shadow Dance”
from a Japanese variety show.
This video was also similar to which Han Geng’s
performance.
Guo Degang, a crosstalk performer was never allowed
to appear in CCTV’s New Year Gala.
However, Guo got a chance “indirectly” this time.
The comedy dialogue performed by Feng Gong and Niu Li,
“Drive for Love”, contained plagiarism.
In the dialogue, Feng asked, “are you sick,” and Niu replied,
“do you have medicine?”
This dialogue was found to originate from a cross-talk
by Guo and Yu Qian.
“Are you sick? Do you have medicine? How much do you need?
As much as you have? As much as you need?”
Many netizens felt angry with CCTV’s New Year gala,
costing 200 million RMB.
It contained two pieces which were involved in severe
plagiarism.
They called for a boycott of “CCTV gala’s second-hand
performance!”
Some netizens highlighted whether UNJASH required CCTV
to pay the large copyright royalties for its sketch.
What will CCTV do? How embarrassing it would be to go
to court?
An Southern Metropolis Daily article by Zhu Yonghua, said
that the whole CCTV’s gala relied on the lighting.
It is more likely to be an imagery project which bluffs people.
CCTV’s gala has been involved in fraud before. There are
always rumors that singers are only mouthing the words.
Even the congratulatory letter read by the emcees were
revealed by netizens to be faked.
Ye Kuangzheng, Chinese poet and literary critic, discovered
that the emcees in this year’s gala had no confidence.
They had the worst performance ever.
Ye Kuangzheng: “They didn’t even believe in their own
words.
They can no longer have the passion to influence the audience
in this way.
If you watch them, you will feel the insincerity from
their words.”
An article from “RedNet” said that most scripts for CCTV’s
gala were composed by several “hack writers.”
They do not only control performers, but also monopolize
the production of some programs.
The repeating plagiarism and frauds are due to these
hack writers having lost all creativity.
NTD reports Li Jing and Wang Mingyu
