【新唐人2014年04月04日讯】备受诟病的中共党媒《环球时报》总编辑胡锡进，日前在“香港中文大学”演讲中，用各种方式表达他对中共的忠心，并重复宣称党的利益代表人民的利益，我代表13亿人等，引起现场观众的不满，有维权律师当场呛声，还有香港教授脱鞋离场抗议。
4月1号《环球时报》总编辑胡锡进以《大陆媒体今年的变化和思考》为题，在“香港中文大学”进行演讲。
香港《明报》报导说，胡锡进在演讲时，首先说《环时》不是官媒，而是市场化媒体，市场发行量极大，他们有政府和市场两个老板，“我把这两个老板侍候得都不错”。
胡锡进声称《环时》的意见与大众意见一致，媒体不能脱离政治现实，并说自己是一个现实主义者。
不过在提问环节，“香港中文大学”政治哲学副教授周保松说，他非常耐心听了胡锡进的演讲，里面大量使用了党的利益代表人民的利益，说他代表13亿人等。他请不赞同胡锡进演讲内容的人举手示意。结果超过一半的人举手。
之后周保松脱下鞋子，用手提着，从观众席走出演讲厅表示抗议。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣认为，现场观众对胡锡进的抗议，实际上是对他背后中共当局的不满。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣：“像官方体制内的，像胡锡进这样的人，他不可能讲自己真实的一些话，这些人可以说是投机分子，他所说的那一套，迎合官方说法，完全暴露他完全是一个工具，可以说是一个奴才身份。”
北京评论人士查建国：“现在中国社会对共产党的认识已经形成重大分裂，有很严重的对立，香港来说，他们是一个自由的社会，对于共产党侵犯人权自由，限制人民自由，不民主，不人权的现象，应该是看的很清楚的。”
出席演讲的北京维权律师滕彪质问胡锡进：“如果党和人民利益一致何不敢开放言论，六四、法轮功、许志永等又如何解释？滕彪还要求胡锡进回应网民称他是帮党“叼飞盘的狗”一说。
胡锡进回应说，中国发展过程必然出现问题，开放言论，中国“承受不起”。
查建国指出，面对六四事件，和法轮功事件，如果开放言论，“承受不起”的首先是中共而不是中国。
查建国：“所谓中国承受不了，只是讲中国共产党承受不了，对于中国来说，没有什么不可以承受的，人民就是中国的主人，主人言论自由了，中国有什么不能承受的？只是你这个党能不能承受。”
朱欣欣指出，如果开放媒体，开放言论，中共转眼之间就会跨台，因为它的历史和现状都充满了罪恶。
朱欣欣：“它完全是靠谎言和欺骗来活着的，它现在这个统治都不敢见光，它肮脏的历史，它丑恶的现实，都会顷刻之间就会把它们自己统治瓦解掉，所以它特别害怕言论的自由，特别害怕阳光把它们丑恶的嘴脸暴露出来。”
胡锡进领导的《环球时报》因长期为中共站台，被民间讥笑为“叼飞盘的狗”。还因发表《媒体应是国家利益的“看门狗”》一文，被网民戏称为“党的看门狗”。
舆论质疑主办方为什么会邀请胡锡进。“中文大学中国研究服务中心”主任陈韬文对外表示，因他是中国舆论界代表人物，折射出中国的争议和力量对比。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/孙宁
Audience Left in Protest at Global Times Editor´s Talk
Global Times is a much criticized Communist regime official
media.
Its editor Hu Xijin recently gave a talk at Chinese University of
Hong Kong.
He claimed that he represents the 1.3 billion Chinese.
He expressed his loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
and stressed the CCP interests are the people´s interests.
In the audience, a human rights lawyer confronted Hu Xijin´s
talk and a professor protested by leaving with his shoes in his hands.
On April 1, Global Times editor Hu Xijin gave a talk at the
Chinese University of Hong Kong about
the mainland media´s change and reflection.
According to Hong Kong’s Ming Pao News, Hu introduced
Global Times (GT) not as an official media but a market media
with big circulation, and owned by two bosses,
the government and the market.
He said, “I have served both bosses quite well.”
Hu Xijing claimed that GT shares the view of the public.
However, as a realist, he said the media can not divorce from
political reality.
In the Q & A session, Prof. Chow Po Chung from Department of
Government & Public Administration expressed that he had paid
attention to Mr. Hu´s talk, which consisted largely that the party´s
interests are the people´s interests and that he represents the 1.3 billion
people.
Prof. Chung asked those in the audience who did not agree to raise their
hands. More than half of the audience did.
Right after that, Prof. Chung took off his shoes in protest and
left the audience.
Former editor of Hebei People’s Radio Zhu Xinxin believes
the protest of the audience is showing the dissatisfaction towards
the CCP behind Hu Xijin.
Zhu Xinxin, former editor of Hebei People’s Radio: “People such
as Hu Xijin in the CCP system will never speak their true thoughts.
They are the so-called speculators.
His talk caters to the official statement and completely exposes
him as a tool with an identity of a marionette."
Beijing commentator Zha Jianguo: “There is a major split in the
Chinese about the CCP.
As a free society, Hong Kong sees it clearly as the violation
by the CCPof human rights and freedom."
In the audience, Beijing human rights lawyer Teng Biao asked
Hu Xijin: “If the party and the people’s interests are one,
why would the CCP not dare to be open about opinions?” and
“How to explain the June 4 massacre, the incidents such as
Falun Gong, Xu Zhiyong and so forth?"
Teng Biao also asked Hu to respond to the netizens mocking Hu
as the go fetch dog of the CCP.
Hu Xijin responded that problems are inevitable during
development, however, relaxation of censorship is something China
“cannot afford."
Zha Jianguo criticizes that to face the issues such as the
June 4 massacre and the Falun Gong, and to open the discussion,
it is the CCP, not China, who cannot afford it.
Zha Jianguo: “It is the Communist Party of China that cannot
afford it.
The people are the owners of China. The owners are free to speak,
why would China not afford it? It is the CCP who cannot afford it."
Zhu Xinxin indicates open media and open speech will lead to
the collapse of the CCP right away because of its evil history and
presence.
Zhu Xinxin: “It is completely made of lies and deceit.
The dirty history and ugly reality will instantly ruin its rule.
Free speech is terrifying to them.
It will only expose their filthy acts and talk."
The Global Times, led by Hu Xijin, has served as a platform for
the CCP and has been ridiculed as a “go fetch dog.”
Its opinion article, “The media should be the national interest
watchdog," was dubbed by netizens as the “party watchdog."
Why would the organizers invite Hu Xijin to talk?
The Service Center for China Studies Director Joseph Man Chan
said Mr. Hu represents the Chinese media and
reflects the Chinese power in debate.
Interview/Yi Ruo Post-Production/Li Yong
