【新唐人2011年11月24日讯】中国著名艺术家艾未未，在遭到大陆官方媒体不断抹黑后，这几天他做出反击，在推特贴出《环球时报》总编辑等4人的手机号码，并称呼他们是“五毛领军人物”。民众对艾未未非常支持，认为公布这些人的手机号码，可以让更多人去谴责他们。
11月20号，艾未未在推特上贴出《环球时报》总编胡锡进、报纸主笔王文、中国政法大学副教授吴法天和左派人士司马南的手机号码。
艾未未指责《环球时报》与公安联手对他进行打压，在他被中共拘留期间，《环球时报》不遗余力对他进行抹黑，并且抹黑的节奏和公安审讯一致，他的名字在所有的报纸都不能出现，在新浪微博上也被封杀。唯有《环球时报》有特殊权力来对他进行专职的抹黑。
艾未未母亲高瑛：“我认为公布他们的电话是对的，艾未未一个人他又没舆论工具，他的网站给封了，他的博客都封了。你是一个媒体，你整天在媒体里胡说八道，你还不愿公布你的电话号码，你也太见不得太阳了见不得阳光了。你打人家一百下，人家踢你一脚就不可以了，艾未未现在干什么都不对，他们可以随便说，艾未未说就有事。”
结石宝宝家长赵连海也支持艾未未的做法。
赵连海：“司马南他这几个人，实际上他们这些人目前来讲，做的事情就是来为专制体制在做喉舌，所以公布他们的一些信息，让更多的人去遣责他，我认为是必要的。”
记者23号致电《环球时报》总编胡锡进等4人，司马南关机，另外3人的电话则始终无人接听。但胡锡进在微博上说他接到大量短信，不断有人打电话打扰。吴法天在微博上说他在几分钟内拦截几百条短信，300多个电话。
对此，前山东大学教授孙文广表示，没做亏心事不怕鬼敲门。
孙文广：“那么就是(我)写的每一篇文章都把自己的电话放在上面，为的就是便于别人联系。对于这些人来讲啊，他们如果说真没做什么亏心事的话，让别人知道他的电话号码呢，也没什么大的问题。”
《环球时报》早前曾发表评论，号称西方给艾未未的庇护太特殊、艾未未借钱还税改变不了逃税事实等……。
22号，《环球时报》又针对艾未未公布总编电话号码一事，以中英文连续发表3篇文章抨击艾未未。其中一篇号称，艾未未的行为是“因政治分歧而采取反道德行为的又一突出例子”。并宣称：从未对艾未未进行过人身攻击。
孙文广：“现在中国算是敢于批评政府的人，敢于批评当局的人，那么官方媒体都会一致下手进行打压。”
《环球时报》的另一篇文章，则一如既往的给艾未未带上“反华”的大帽子。
赵连海：“艾未未这个事件简单来说，实际上就是官方在进行压制，对民间维权，对民间争取公众自由，争取民主一种打压。”
公共知识份子丁咚发文，斥责《环球时报》自诞生之日起就以意识形态划界，主动放弃一个媒体的社会责任，放弃良知，自觉充当利益集团的打手。
艾未未则对《美国之音》表示，这些人用《人民日报》旗下的报纸发泄私愤，却不敢站出来与他正面交锋。他说：有本事我们来做一个辩论? 或者也让我在《环球时报》上发表一篇文章?
赵连海呼吁胡锡进、司马南这类中共喉舌，应该思考一下中国的大形势，不要再做违背良心的历史罪人。
新唐人记者李韵、孙宁采访报导。
Ai Published GT Editors’ Phones
The renown Chinese artist Ai Weiwei is being consistently
discredited by the official media in mainland China.
Now he is fighting back by twittering the phone numbers
of four chief editors’ of Global Times and calling them “leaders of the 50 cent army." People are supportive of Ai and think the phone numbers’
announcement will help more people condemn the editors.
On November 20, Ai Weiwei posted the phone numbers
of Global Times’ key staff on Twitter.
These include the chief editor Hu Xijin, the chief writer
Wang Wen, A/Prof. of Politics and Law University Wu Fatian, and the leftist Si Manan.
Ai accused Global Times and the police of pressuring him
during his detention by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Global Times spared no efforts to discredit him,
which was in conjunction with the police’s interrogation.
His name can not appear in any newspaper
or Sina micro-blog.
Only Global Times has the special power
to carry out a full-time discrediting materials on him.
Wang Ying (Ai Weiwei’s mother): “I think it is not wrong
to publish their phone numbers.
Ai Weiwei does not have any media tools,
and his website and blog are sealed.
This is a media that publishes nonsense all day long,
but does not want to show its phone numbers.
It is too timid and fearful. It is like you can punch others
a hundred times, but do not allow others to hit you even ones.
Whatever Ai Weiwei does is not wrong now. They can say
whatever they want, but if Ai speaks, there will be a problem."
Zhao Lianhai, the father of Jieshi Baobao,
also supports Ai Weiwei’s deed.
Zhao Lianhai: “These people, like Si Manan, in the current
situation are mouthpieces of the authoritarian regime.
So it is necessary to publish some of their information,
as to let more people condemn them."
On November 23 , a reporter called Global Times’
editor Hu Xijin and the other three people.
Only Si Manan’s phone was on,
no one answered the other three’s phones.
But Hu Xijin said he received a lot of text messages
on his microblog and someone kept calling him.
Wu Fatian said on his microblog that he received hundreds
of text messages and more than 300 calls in a few minutes.
In this regard, the former professor of Shandong University,
Sun Wenguang said, if they didn’t do anything wrong, they won’t be afraid of ghosts knocking on their door.
Sun Wenguang: “I added my phone number on every
article I wrote to help others contact me.
For these people, if they didn’t do anything against good
conscience, there is no big problem to let people know their phone numbers."
Earlier Global Times wrote, Ai Weiwei got special protection
from the West and could not change the fact to borrow money and pay back his tax evasion…
On November 22, Global Times published three articles,
both in English and Chinese, criticizing Ai’s phone numbers’ publishing.
One of the articles wrote, Ai Weiwei’s behavior is “another
example of anti-ethical behavior due to political differences."
And it declared that they have never
personally attacked Ai Weiwei.
Sun Wenguang: “Now in mainland China, people who have
the courage to criticize the Chinese government and
dare to criticize the authorities,
will be suppressed by all official media."
Another Global Times’ article slapped Ai Weiwei
with the usual “anti-China" label.
Zhao Lianhai: “To simply explain Ai Weiwei’s case, this is
the official suppression of civil rights, of the fight for freedom and democracy."
Intellectual Ding Dong wrote an article,
which denounced the actions of the Global Times.
He wrote, from their date of birth they obeyed the ideological
demarcation,
gave up their social responsibility and conscience as a media,
and acted as thugs of the interests’ groups.
Ai Weiwei told Voice of America that these newspapers under
the umbrella of People’s Daily vent their private anger, but don’t dare to confront him face to face.
He said: “If you dare we can have a debate?
Or let me publish an article in Global Times?"
Zhao Lianhai called for Hu Xijin, Si Manan and the other
CCP mouthpieces to think about the big picture in China.
He asked them to stop acting against their conscience
and not be of those people that history will condemn.
NTD reporters Li Yun and Sun Ning.
