【禁闻】网民喊﹕国库弹药库前巡视组止步

【新唐人2013年07月10日讯】中共中央巡视组下地方寻找违纪违法的“老虎”和“苍蝇”官员。可是,最近大陆网民却高呼,巡视组官员,“国库门前请止步”。还有网友对巡视组发出警告说:千万别查军队的弹药库!尤其不能查核武库。因为之前巡视组进驻调查的“中国储备粮管理总公司”和“中国储备棉管理总公司”,刚一查就发生大火。也有香港媒体提出“谁来监督巡视组?”的质疑声音。请看以下报导。

5月27号,中共第一巡视组进驻“中储粮”,31号,“中储粮”黑龙江林甸粮仓突发蹊跷大火,78个储粮囤表面过火,5万吨粮食被火焰亲吻,损失过亿。

中储粮”大火刚发生一个月后,7月1号,“中储棉”山西侯马代储库再次发生火灾,10座棉库,约3.6万吨棉花,基本燃烧殆尽,损失达3亿元。而当天,刚好是中共派出的45个巡视、督导组陆续到达各地。

这两场突发的蹊跷大火是巧合,还是预谋?巡视组、督导组,闭口不谈,作为监管部门的中共物资储备局,也没去追责。但是,在网路上却掀起了轩然大波,网民们呼吁:钦差们,国库门前请止步,以免招致意外大火损失﹔也有网友发出警告:千万别查军队的弹药库!尤其不能查核武库,一查就炸。

北京时政观察人士华颇指出,这反映出中国民众对中共当局的不满,尤其是对巡视组失望的情绪非常大,他们认为巡视组,不可能为他们解决实际问题,巡视只是一场“扰民秀”。

北京时政观察人士华颇:“习近平派这些中央巡视组到地方,其实是中央和地方利益博弈而已,因为习要建立一个强势的中央,要加强中央集权制,但是中央和地方在问题的看法上、观点上,还有利益上产生了很大的分歧,所以他要让地方服从中央,采取的一些方法,就是派巡视组下到地方,监视地方政府的一举一动,给予地方政府一些压力。”

大陆自由撰稿人刘逸明指出,巡查组到地方后,当地官员为了掩盖真相,很可能会去制造一些事端,或毁灭一些烂账或贪腐证据,真正的腐败他们很难查到。不过刘逸明也不排除巡视组与地方当局沆瀣一气,牟取私利。

大陆自由撰稿人刘逸明:“很多人知道有些官是贪官,但是毕竟没有直接的证据,再则就算你有证据,你这个证据也不一定让他们能够看得到,比如,有人写信给巡视组,你这个信件很可能会被地方截留,所以巡视组要想真正的打‘老虎’、打‘苍蝇’,还是很不容易的。”

香港《东方日报》评论指出,被认为中共所谓反腐创新的中央巡视组推出十年,早已衍生为依靠巡视、监督,牟取私利的特殊利益集团,巡视组下不察民,上不督官,变成吃喝玩乐的“腐败组”。

之前,曾有报导说,湖北省委13人的巡视组,到国家级贫困县秭归巡视20多天,花费80万元。相当于200多名秭归农民全年收入的总和。

华颇:“他们巡查组下去,可以说并不是解决人民群众最关心、最直接的利益问题,解决不了,所以他们巡查组有一条规矩,就是不接受上查,所以,低层老百姓还是一个有冤无处伸,有问题无法解决。”

事实上,中央巡视组成立后,官场的腐败并没有减少,反而愈演愈烈,民间的上访也没有减少,反而愈来愈多。港媒还指出,中央巡视组领队的正部级官员,大多数是退休的省市领导或者部长,有些人本身就与地方官有着千丝万缕的利益关系,以巡视为名,牵线搭桥,买官卖官,甚至进行官商勾结。因此,让他们去监督百官,简直是与虎谋皮。

采访编辑/李韵 后制/李勇

Netizens Don’t Trust Central Inspection Teams

The central Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
has sent working parties to different areas
of China, to investigate corruption officials.
However, netizens have called for a stop to the investigation.

Some netizens said, “Don’t check
the army’s ammunition depot!”
The netizens are referring to when previous working parties
investigated Sinograin and the National cotton repository.
Fires broke out. Hong Kong media questioned
who will be monitoring the working parties?
Let’s take a look.

On May 27, the first work team sent by central government
arrived at China Grain Reserves Corporation (Sinograin).
On May 31, there was a mysterious fire at Sinograin’s
depot in Lindian county, Helongjiang province.
Sources said the fire burned 78 barns containing
50,000 tons of grain.
The damage reportedly is as much
as over 100 million yuan.

On July 1, a month after Sinograin’s fire incident,
strange fire burned a National Cotton Reserves Corporation repository in Shanxi.
Around 36,000 tons of cotton and 10 storage units
were burned.
The damage was estimated at 300 million yuan.

Yet, on that day, 45 central work teams
were allocated to different places.

Are these two strange fires are just coincidence
or a conspiracy? The work teams kept silent.
The regulatory authorities National Material Reserve
Bureau didn’t launch any investigations.
However, the online netizens began a heated debate.

Some said, “Imperial officials, stop doing it to avoid
incurring big fire losses.”
Some netizens warned, “Don’t check army’s
ammunition depot!
especially don’t check nuclear weapon depot, otherwise,
once you check, it will trigger a big bang.”

Hua Po, Beijing current affairs observer, says that it reflects
that Chinese people are dissatisfied with the central government, particularly with central work teams.
The people think it is impossible for work teams to solve
practical problems, and are for show only.

Hua Po: “Xi Jinping sent work teams to local places,
struggling to gain the interest between central and local,
as Xi needs to establish a powerful central government
to strengthen a centralized power system.
However, disputes exist between central and local
authorities regarding opinions and interests.
Thus in order for the local authorities to obey the central,
they sent work teams out to monitor local governments’ every move, giving them pressure.”

Liu Yiming, writer in Mainland China, said local officials
likely create troubles so as to cover up their corruption,
destroying mass accounting or corruption evidence.

Liu analyzed that the possibility of work teams colluding
with local officials for personal gain.

Liu Yiming: “Many people know that some officials are
corrupt, but they didn’t have solid evidence.
Even if there is evidence, corrupt officials may
not let you obtain it.
For example, when people write to work teams,
the letters may be seized by local officials.
Thus it is unrealistic that work teams can really fight
‘tigers’ and ‘flies’.”

Hong Kong’s Oriental Daily comments that central work
teams, which were launched a decade ago, have become a special interest group.
During their “investigation,” they didn’t care about civilians,
neither to monitor officials. They became a corrupt team.

Not long ago, reports said that a 13-member work team
in Hubei went to an impoverished county to inspect for 20 days.
They spent 800,000 yuan, equivalent to more than
200 farmers’ annual income.

Hu Po: “They came, but they didn’t solve problems
that people are most concerned about and most related to.
They can’t resolve it.

The work teams have a rule that they don’t
investigate the higher up levels.
Thus, civilians still have nowhere to complain about
their mistreatment, their problems can’t be solved.”

In fact, since the central work teams were formed,
officials’ corruption hasn’t declined, but increased.
Appeals haven’t reduced,
but increasingly increased.
Hong Kong’s media also said that leaders of central
work teams are ministry-level.
The majority of them are retired provincial,
city-level or ministry-level leaders.
They are closely associated with local officials.

They used the name of “inspection” to build up networks,
sell or purchase official ranks, and collude with businessmen.
Thus is simply unrealistic to allow them to supervise officials.

相关文章
评论
新版即将上线。评论功能暂时关闭。请见谅!