【新唐人2014年06月17日讯】日前，中共中央纪委驻“中国社会科学院”纪检组组长、院党组成员张英伟，批评社科院存在4大问题，其中第4点“社科院存在受境外势力点对点渗透”，中共党媒也以此为题发出文章。外界质疑，是否中共会发动一场如58年前一样的“反右运动”。
6月14号，中共机关报《人民日报》旗下的《人民网》报导，中共中央纪委驻“社科院”纪检组组长张英伟，10号提出，“社科院”意识形态的主要问题，体现在四个方面：第一、穿上学术的隐身衣，制造烟幕﹔第二、利用互联网炮制跨国界的歪理﹔第三、每逢敏感时期，进行不法的勾连活动﹔第四，接受境外势力点对点的渗透。
名为“牛虻”的博客主质疑中共当局《要对“社科院”动手啦？》。他讽刺中共，所谓“制造烟幕”，“跨国歪理”，和“不法勾连”，都不是“中国社科院”科学家智力所能达到的，只有在“接受境外势力点对点的渗透”后，他们才能具有如此高智商和情商！所以，“境外势力渗透”才是中国社科院目前面对的最大问题！
大陆网路作家荆楚：“点对点的渗透，什么境外反华势力，经常《人民网》有这样的称呼，其实境外的反共人士是有，反华势力可以说少之又少，它把反共故意替换成反华，本身就是对全国人民的洗脑，海外很多人士他反共，他并不反华。”
“牛虻”问﹕什么是“跨国界的歪理”？是社科院一些专家们平时口中最喜欢说的“普世价值”吗？那位中纪委官员没有细说。“也许不要多久就会发动起来的革命群众大批判、大揭发运动，会帮这帮学术权威，把这个问题说清楚的。”
“牛虻”质疑，《人民网》的这篇文章，是否会像58年前《人民日报》的文章一样，引发一场“反右运动”。
1956年6月8号，中共中央发出《关于组织力量准备反击右派分子进攻的指示》，同一天，《人民日报》发表《这是为什么？》社论，打响了当年“反右斗争”的第一枪。随后数年里，全国有55万所谓“右派分子”，倒在了“反右斗争”的枪口之下，其中有40多万，没有活到20多年后为他们所谓“改正”的那一天。
荆楚：“共产党的理论、实践、意识形态完全破产了，心虚理亏，它不敢面对世界和国内人民追求真理，追求真相的探索，在毛泽东时代把全国人民关在铁屋子里面，窒息得要死，还让全国人民产生生在红旗下，泡在糖水里的感觉。”
中国社会科学院是被中共称为：“肩负着从整体上提高中国人文社会科学水平使命”的国家级最高科学院，有31个研究所、45个研究中心、有科研业务人员3200多人，属于中共的最大智囊机构，一大批学者在政治、经济、文化等方面为中共中央决策提供理论依据。
原北京首都师范大学副教授李元华认为，中共体制内也存在着不同的派别，而那些强调“社科院”要对中共忠诚的，是中共的极左份子，他们希望倒退到“毛泽东时代”，但是近年来互联网的发展，使他们非常失望，因而把不同的声音视为洪水猛兽。
李元华：“一种不排除中共内斗不同的派别，通过所谓的研究机构，发布一些消息打击自己的政敌，再有一种，有一些还没有丧失良知的学者，把自己的研究成果或调查结果，用报告的形式公布出来，损害那些贪官污吏们的利益。”
去年“社科院”发表过《中国房价面临全面失控》、《雾霾影响生殖能力》和《农民迁移城镇被排斥带来不稳》的学术报告，也发表过《苍蝇危害大于老虎》等文章
而中纪委要求社科院，要保持所谓政治敏感性，还要切实的加强意识形态建设，在政治上要与党中央保持高度一致，不容忍任何人搞特例等。
目前《人民网》的这篇文章已经被删除，不过其它媒体和网站已经纷纷转载。
采访编辑/刘惠 后制/孙宁
Central Discipline Inspection Commission (CDIC) of CCP,
accused the social science Academy infiltrated by “overseas forces”
Recently, Mr Zhang Yingwei, head of Central Discipline
Inspection Commission of Chinese Communist Party (CCP),
of Chinese Social Science Academy (CSSA) as well
as member of CCP committee of CSSA,
criticised the CSSA with four key issues,
the fourth issue being, “CSSA has been filtrated
by overseas forces in a point-to-point way".
Media owned by CCP, also published articles
connected to this issue.
The public opinions are questioning: whether CCP launches
yet another “anti-rightist movement",
similar to those during the Cultural Revolution.
On June 14, the People Website, affiliated with CCP,
reported that Zhang Yingwei, head of Central Discipline
and Inspection of CCP at “CASS",
made the suggestion (on June 10) that “CASS" ideology
has four problems:
Firstly, putting on a cloak of academia, creating
a smokescreen;
secondly, using cross-border Internet concocted
sophistry (clever but false arguments);
thirdly, during sensitive periods, conducted illegal
collusion activities;
and lastly, accepted foreign forces penetration
point, where customer orders are accepted by a manufacturer .
Blog writer “Niu Mang," questioned whether
CCP authorities intended taking any action against CASS.
He mocked CCP’s so called “smokescreen", “cross-border sophistry"
and “illegal collusion activities,"
to not all be the workings and wisdom of scientists of CASS.
Only after they “have been filtrated by point-to-point
foreign forces",
could they ever achieve such a high level of intelligent
and emotional quotient!
So “being filtrated by foreign forces" is the key issue behind
the workings of CASS .
Mainland Internet writer Jing Chu: “Point-to point filtration,
so called anti-China forces from over-seas, are all too
often seen on the People website.
In fact, there are indeed anti-CCP overseas activists, yet the
numbers are dwindling.
They intentionally replace the anti-CCP slogan, with anti-China,
this is to brainwash all Chinese people.
Many overseas people oppose CCP but they don’t oppose China."
“Niu Mang" questioned: what is “cross-border sophistry"?
Is it a term they use meaning “Universal values" claimed
by many experts of CASS?
But the official of CDIC (Central Discipline Inspection
Commission) of CCP, did not mention it.
“It might soon launch revolutionary people to execute
large-scale Thamzing (struggle sessions & propaganda),
along with large-scale exposure movements, aiming at such
academic authorities and clarifying the situation."
On June 8 1956, Central Committee of CCP,
issued “orders to mobilise forces, in preparation of attacking rightists".
On the same day, People’s Daily published “What’s this for?"
showing the first signs of the “Anti-rightist movement".
In the following couple of years, 0.55 million Chinese rightists,
lied of the attack of “Anti-rightists struggle".
Among them, around 0.4 million people could not possibly
attend the “repealing" day 20 years later.
Jing Chu: “CCP’s theories, practice and ideology are
all going to the dogs.
They are guilty and in the wrong. They don’t dare
face the reality of the world in its pursuit of the truth.
During Mao’s times, he confined all people in an iron cell
creating serious suffocation.
They are trying to maintain a national people’s sense of soaking
inside the sweet water under the red banner."
CCP regards CASS as “taking the mission of improving
the overall level of Chinese humanities and social sciences",
this is the highest national Academy of Sciences.
CASS has 31 research institutes, 45 research centres
with a total of more than 3,200 scientific research
and business personnel belonging CCP.
It is also the largest think tank with a large number of scholars
in the political, economic, cultural aspects of
CCP’s central committee,
providing a theoretical basis for decision-making.
Former Associate Professor of Beijing “Capital Normal
University" Li Yuanhua,
believes that there are different factions within the CCP regime,
with those who emphasise “CASS" loyalty to CCP,
are the radical leftists of the CCP.
They want to go backwards to a “Mao era". However,
the development of the Internet in recent years,
is of much disappointment to them, as now there are
many voices.
Li Yuanhua: “One possibility which cannot be ruled out,
is to publish messages attacking their political enemies;
another is a scholar without losing his conscience,
or put the research findings or survey results to be published,
in the form of reports on corrupt officials
who harm their interests. “
Last year, “CASS" published " a series of reports including,
“China is facing a comprehensive house price crash",
“haze affects reproductive capacity"
and “excluding farmers during resettling and relocating
from the city and urban areas will bring instability".
CASS also published an article called
“the perils of the flies creates more harm than the Tiger" .
The CDIC of CCP, required “CASS" to maintain
the so-called political sensitivity,
but also effectively strengthen ideological construction,
to be politically highly consistent with the CCP
without tolerating any exceptions and the like.
Currently the People Website has deleted this article,
but other media and websites have been reproduced.
Interview & Edit/Liu Hui Post-Production/Sun Ning
