【新唐人2014年06月27日讯】大陆经济学者茅于轼、和“北京大学”法学教授贺卫方最近在微博上，反驳了中共纪委驻社科院纪检组组长张英伟公开提出的﹕社科院存在的意识形态“四大问题”。一起去看一看。
中共纪委驻社科院的纪检组组长张英伟日前公开说，社科院存在的意识形态有：一，以学术的隐身衣制造烟幕，二，用互联网炮制跨国界歪理，三，敏感时期进行不法勾连，四，接受境外势力点对点的渗透。张英伟要求全院在政治上要与中共保持高度一致。
大陆经济学者茅于轼引用“人大”、“银行”、“银监会”、“证监会”，还有“火车”、“飞机”、“计算机”等反问张英伟：“哪样不是西方渗透？”他还补充说，“中国从西方引进（或被渗透）的思潮中，哪些给中国人民带来福祉？哪些带来灾难？”
大陆“公盟”创始人、维权律师滕彪：“他（张英伟）的这些说法，实际上就是原来的那些阶级斗争的思维方式又一次回归。一贯的用‘敌我斗争’这种思维，把西方自由民主、坚持普世价值的世界当做是敌对势力，以颠覆政权为目地，在中国寻找他们的代言人。”
针对张英伟10号所说的社科院“接受境外势力点对点的渗透”，“北京大学”法学教授贺卫方质疑说：学者专门研究和输入一位“境外学者”的学说，这属于学术研究﹔如果他接受了某项特别资助，从事了损害国家利益的行为，那是国家情治部门的业务。
多数舆论批评，本该负责抓贪官的中纪委“不务正业”、“手伸得太长”。
滕彪：“因为官方的意识型态和它的话语系统太可笑，和人的基本的常识和逻辑都矛盾，加上互联网的出现，所以不再吃原来这一套意识型态话语的人越来越多了。他们就感觉到力不从心。现在信共产党的人也没有信自由民主的人更多。”
民间舆论笑指：当年中共创始人李大钊、陈独秀等人，就是接受了苏俄共产份子“点对点的渗透”，才把共产主义、暴力革命等引入中国。
对张英伟所说的“利用互联网炮制跨国界的歪理”，大陆网络作家、自由撰稿人刘逸明反驳说，在网上谈论国家大事，这都是知识份子的自由，并没有违法。
大陆网络作家、自由撰稿人刘逸明：“根本原因是一党专制。就是想要控制知识份子，尤其是在敏感时期，要把握好自己言论尺度。如果说跟外界有联系就是跟外界勾连，就有罪，那中共就不要出国访问！干脆把互联网全部切断，再把国际长途全部给停掉！”
至于“跨国界的歪理”这个新名词，到底是指什么？大陆官方和张英伟个人都没有进一步说明。
刘逸明：“那只是他认为是歪理，老百姓的眼睛是雪亮的。为什么你的‘正理’就不能够引导民众？靠‘歪理’偏能引导群众呢？他们没有办法自圆其说。古时候士大夫阶层还比较敢言、有社会的担当，一党专制对于真理的打压，对于言论自由的打压，比古时候更厉害。”
滕彪指出，大陆的体制和意识形态，和整个知识份子群体互相敌对。
滕彪：“经过一场又一场的政治斗争，整个中国知识界好像被打断了脊梁，一切的研究、一切的言论，都是以共产党的意志为出发点。整个中国的知识份子当中具有独立精神的、自由精神的，敢说、敢言、敢担当的，是非常少的。”
滕彪认为，官方的这番话，现在已经吓不倒中国独立的公共知识份子，目前网上的反馈，也多嘲讽中共，没有人把它当真。
采访编辑/唐音 后制/陈建铭
Chinese Intellectuals Refute Accusation of Western Infiltration
Mao Yushi, Chinese economist, and He Weifang,
law professor of Peking University disagree with Zhang Yinwei.
Zhang Yingwei, is the regional team leader of the Chinese
Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) disciplinary group.
He has asserted that “CASS has four major ideological problems".
Let´s take a look.
Zhang Yingwei said the 4 ideologies in CASS include:
creating trouble in the name of academia;
creating cross-border sophistry via the Internet;
illicit collusion during a sensitive period;
and accepting infiltration by foreign forces.
Zhang requests CASS staff to politically align themselves
with the central Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Mao Yushi responded on Weibo “Why do we have
a People´s Congress, banks, a Banking Regulatory Commission,
trains, planes, computers and more?
Are any of these not infiltrated from the West?"
“Regarding Western ideas imported into China, which one has
benefited Chinese people? Which one has caused disasters?"
Teng Biao, China-based human rights lawyer: “Zhang´s words
actually are the mentality of class struggle again,
which always promoted ideas of struggle against enemies.
Zhang accused Western democracy and upholding universal
values as hostile forces.
He also accused the purpose of these Western “hostile forces"
is to take over the CCP´s power and find representatives in China."As for Zhang Yingnan´s words “accepting infiltration by hostile
foreign forces´,
He Weifang questioned that “scholars specially study and
introduce one overseas scholar´s concept
belongs to academic research;
if one accepted funds for a unique project,
then it damaged our country´s interest,
it’s the job of the national intelligence agency.
Many members of the public condemn central disciplinary
departments for not doing a proper job of
investigating corrupt officials.
Teng Biao: “The system of official ideology and
thinking is ridiculous,
it contradicts basic common sense and logic.
Now with the growth of the Internet, more and more people
don´t accept these kinds of arguments.
So the CCP feels weak.
and less people believe the CCP than democracy."
Some people say that in the early years, the CCP co-founders
Li Dazhao, Chen Duxiu and others accepted
Russian CCP infiltration, then soviet socialism and
violent revolution was imported into China.
As for Zhang Yingwei´s accusation of “creating
cross-border sophistry via the Internet",
Chinese writer Liu Yiming argues that talking about
the country affairs on the Internet is intellectuals´ freedom,
it didn´t break the law.
Liu Yiming: “The fundamental problem
is one-party´s tyrannical rule.
It just wants to control intellectuals.
Especially in a sensitive time, one must be careful to control
one´s speech.If having overseas contacts, means being accused of
collusion with foreign countries, and committing crimes,
then CCP officials should not go abroad!
In addition, the internet and international
telephone lines should be cut off completely!"
Regarding Zhang Yingwei´s new phrase “cross-border
sophistry", what indeed does that mean?
Zhang and his officials have no further explanation.
Liu Yiming: “That´s his own saying.
People´s eyes are clear.
Why can’t the CCP´s “right principle"
guide people? but “sophistry" does?
Actually, the CCP couldn´t find a way
to back up its words.
In ancient China, scholars spoke directly and bravely, and
were responsible to society.
Now one-Party rule suppresses the truth and expression,
it’s worse than the old days!"
Teng Biao says that the system and ideology in China
antagonize the entire intelligentsia.
Teng Biao: “After so many political struggles, the backbone of
Chinese academia seems broken.
All research and expression of views must align
with the CCP´s stance.
Yet there are many people left in intellectual circles, who have
independent and free minds,
who dare to speak out and take responsibility."
Teng Biao believes that such official words cannot threaten
independent intellectuals any more,
So far, the majority of online responses are mocking the CCP,
nobody takes it seriously.
Interview & Edit/Tangyin Post-Production/ChenJiMing
