【新唐人2014年06月04日讯】大陆《炎黄春秋》杂志执行主编洪振快和黄钟，因为跟毛左阵营梅新育等两名学者就《狼牙山五壮士》的历史真相，在微博上发生纷争。他们起诉两人的案件原定于六月3号和4号开庭，却突然接获法院延期的通知，目前，无法得知法庭延迟开庭的原因。
《狼牙山五壮士》是一篇收入在大陆语文教科书的文章，文章描述5名中共士兵跟日本军队作战，最后跳下悬崖的故事。但是近年来这个故事的真实性遭到质疑。
据《南方都市报》去年8月31号报导，广东广州市越秀区警方于8月29号晚间将一位在大陆微博上所谓“污蔑狼牙山五壮士”的网民抓获，并以虚构信息、散布谣言的罪名予以行政拘留7天。
据媒体报导，这名网友实际上是传播了2011年12月14号，网路里，一篇名为《狼牙山五壮士的真相原来是这样！》的帖子，帖子内容引述当地人的话说，《狼牙山五壮士》里面的那5人，只不过是几个共产党的散兵游勇，来村里后要吃要喝，而且稍不如意就打人。由于几个人手上有枪，村民们也不敢对他们怎么样。后来有人想出了个办法，偷偷的把他们的行踪告诉了日本人，于是日本人就来围剿他们。
去年9月，大陆《炎黄春秋》杂志执行主编洪振快在《财经网》上质疑说，警方如何判定历史上的事是否是谣言？为此，他进行考证，发现“狼牙山五壮士”故事从一开始就存在诸多细节分歧。
洪振快指出，语文课本当中关于“五壮士”的作战目地、撤退方向、跳崖地点等历史信息，都与事实有出入。他说，“五壮士”最后阶段的作战目地主要是掩护连队主力撤退，而谈不上掩护群众转移。五名战士登上狼牙山，是被逼无奈，而不是把敌人引上绝路。
洪振快随后跟另一名编辑在《炎黄春秋》2013年第11期共同撰文指出，不同资料对“狼牙山五壮士”的很多细节描述都是不一致的，包括有没有拔老百姓的萝卜吃。
目前供职于商务部担任研究员的梅新育，则在大陆微博反驳说：《炎黄春秋》的这些编辑和作者是些什么心肠啊？打仗的时候都不能拔个萝卜吃？梅新育随后骂了一句脏话。
今年4月，洪振快在微博上宣布，起诉梅新育获准立案。并解释起诉梅新育的深层原因是：中国社会存在一类人，遇到不符合其固有观念的人和事，不问事实，不讲道理，就开始骂人。此类行为严重恶化了社会风气，降低了全社会的道德水准。为使讨论问题回归理性，也促使这些人树立基本的法治观念，必须进行这场公益诉讼。
5月26号，双方再次火花四射。梅新育的微博写道，当天收到丰台法院通知6月3号开庭。他表示准备迎战。洪振快回应说，希望梅、郭两人好好准备，请个好律师，来场高水平的法庭辩论。
洪振快6月2号告诉《新唐人》，法院已经通知推迟审理案件。
大陆《炎黄春秋》执行主编洪振快：“你去看他们两个的微博你会知道，起诉现在延迟了。（记者:延迟到什么时候？）现在不清楚。（记者:为什么延迟呢？）我们不清楚。”
洪振快并表示，已经做好诉讼的准备。
而中国社科院下属的“国家文化安全与意识形态建设研究中心”，也在“微博”咄咄逼人的写道，这个诉讼案事关所谓“抗日史实真相曲直及当今社会道德价值取向的重大问题”，并骂道﹕“辱蔑抗日英雄，天理不容！司法部门更要讲党性！”
洪振快去年9月在《财经网》撰文指出，“抗日战争中的英雄应该受到敬仰，但本着对历史负责的态度，当时的实际情况如何，公众有了解真相的权利。如果说当时为了激励军民抗日意志，夸大宣传可以理解的话，但时过境迁，历史条件完全改变之后，人们更想知道历史真相。”
洪振快是历史学者，出版的著作有《讲武论剑》、《红楼梦古画录》、《亚财政》等，其中2008年出版的《亚财政》引起广泛关注。
采访编辑/秦雪 后制/李勇
Court Delays Hearing on Langyashan Truth Debate
An online dispute about the historical facts of “five heroes” at
Langyashan during the Sino-Japanese war has been going on
between Yanhuang Chunqiu magazine and the Maoist left
scholars.
The court hearing on June 3 and 4 was suddenly postponed
without an explanation.
Langyashan’s Five Heroes is a story taught at elementary
school.
It describes five Chinese Communist soldiers fighting with
the Japanese army, and finally jumping off a cliff.
The authenticity of this story, however, received much criticism.
Last year, Southern Metropolis Daily had reported that
Guangzhou police arrested a Chinese on August 29.
He was said to have spread online rumors to slander
Langyashan’s Five Heroes and subjected to a7-day administrative
detention.
Chinese media revealed, a Dec. 14, 2011 online post, “The fact
about Langyashan’s five heroes is actually this!” detailed what
locals described: The five heroes were in fact stragglers of the
Communist Party, who went to the village and demanded food
and drink.
They hit when displeased.
The villagers were frightened for they held guns.
Someone decided to report their whereabouts to the Japanese
who came to the village to crush them.
Last September, Yanhuang Chunqiu magazine executive editor
Hong Zhenkuai commented, how can the police discern if it’s
historical fact or rumor?
His research then led to finding many differences in the
details of the Langyashan’s Five Heroes.
Hong Zhenkuai pointed out that many details were different
from the facts, including the purpose of the battle, the direction
of retreat, and the location of jumping.
He stated, the final battle was conducted to cover the retreat,
rather than transfer of the mass of civilians.
The five soldiers were forced to get onto Langya Mountain,
rather than lead the enemy to a dead end.
The 11th edition of 2013, Yanhuang Chunqiu magazine
published an article by both Hong Zhenkuai and Huang Zhong
detailing the different descriptions about the five heroes in
Langyashan, including whether or not the soldiers had dug the
radishes.
A researcher at the Ministry of Commerce, Mei Xinyu, retorted
on Weibo: What kind of hearts do the Yanhuang Chunqiu
magazine editor and writer have?
Can’t the soldiers dig a radish during the war?
Mei Xinyu also swore in his post.
This April, Hong Zhenkuai announced on Weibo that the
lawsuit against Mei Xinyu was permitted.
He explained the reason for the lawsuit: There are a group of
people in China now who ignore the facts and rationality and
would just curse against people and things opposed to the
accepted concepts.
These behaviors have seriously damaged social values and
moral standards.
This public interest litigation must be conducted to restore
rational discussion and establish fundamental legal concepts.
On May 26, the two sides clashed again.
Mei Xinyu stated on Weibo that he had received the court
notice that the hearing is scheduled for June 3.
He is ready for the battle.
Hong Zhenkuai responded, he expected the opponents to hire
good lawyers for a high standard of court debate.
Hong Zhenkuai told the NTD on June 2 that the court has
postponed the hearing.
Hong Zhenkuai: Their Weibo post has also stated that the
hearing is postponed.
NTD reporter: Until when?
Hong Zhenkuai: Not sure.
NTD reporter: Why is it postponed?
Hong Zhenkuai: We don’t know.
Hong Zhenkuai indicates that he is ready for the debate.
The Academy of Marxism under the Chinese Academy of
Social Sciences also argued on Weibo that the lawsuit is about
the historical facts of anti-Japanese and the moral values of
society.
It also stated, “God forbids those who dishonor the war heroes!
The judiciary should acknowledge the Party spirit!”
Hong Zhenkuai published an article in Caijing last September:
The war heroes ought to be respected.
However, to be responsible to history, the public has the
right to learn the facts.
The temporary hype to inspire during the war is understandable.
However, time has passed and as history continues,
people want to know the truth.
Hong Zhenkuai is a historian.
He is the author of “Historical facts of martial arts novels”,
“Paintings of Dream of the Red Chamber”, “Political Wealth”,
and so forth.
In particular, the 2008 “Political Wealth” has received
widespread acclaim.
Interview & Edit/QinXue Post-Production/LiYong
