【新唐人2014年08月28日讯】刚刚成立一个多月的中国网路媒体《澎湃新闻网》，因屡爆中共贪官“猛料”，日前遭到中共“社会科学院”一家研究中心的点名批评，指称《澎湃网》“不守底线”，要给予“纠正偏颇”。而评论认为，中共党内争夺话语权，已经到了短兵相接、持刀见红的地步了。
8月25号，“社科院”下属的“国家文化安全与意识形态建设研究中心”，在“微博”发布贴文说：“针对《澎湃新闻网》开通以来的一系列不当做法，中央领导和有关部门及时提出严厉批评予以纠偏，并明确要求包括新媒体在内的所有新闻媒体都要‘一个标准、亮明底色、筑牢底线’，不允许任何单位搞特殊！ ”
8月18号，中共现任领导人习近平曾强调，要着力打造一批“形态多样、手段先进的新型主流媒体”，《澎湃新闻网》被民间视为其中代表之一。
而“社科院”下属机关的帖文一出，立即引来大批网友围观，不少人追问﹕《澎湃新闻网》“开通以来的一系列不当做法”，具体是指什么？而且是哪位“中央领导和有关部门”及时提出严厉批评？
据了解，《澎湃新闻网》是由上海《东方早报》编采团队运作，自7月22号正式上线以来，因经常揭露中共贪官受查的内幕而走红。网页中更有所谓“打虎记”，报导大、小“老虎”下台的新闻。中共“网路安全和信息化领导小组办公室”主任鲁炜，还曾前往《澎湃新闻网》办公室视察。
旅美原大陆历史学教授刘因全认为，这个事件说明习近平阵营和江派的斗争，已经到了短兵相接、持刀见红的地步了。
旅美原大陆历史学教授刘因全：“社科院的这些人反对《澎湃网》这样做，我相信这是中共党内这些反对反贪的这些人。换句话说，就是那些贪污腐败分子。说的更具体一点，就是以江泽民为代表的那些贪污腐败势力，他们进行反扑。”
据了解，爆料《澎湃网》被批评的是“社科院”一研究院原党委书记侯惠勒，他一向鼓吹“反普世价值”。
而中共政治局内，主管意识形态和宣传领域的政治局常委刘云山，与“社科院”关系密切。中纪委驻“社科院”纪检组组长张英伟，被认为是刘云山的嫡系部下。两人共事多年，关系密切。
刘因全：“刘云山他是一个江派的人物，他也是一个腐败非常严重的人物，他掌控的新闻媒体基本上在这里和习近平、王岐山这一派来唱反调，我们看到他不断的来制造一些麻烦，我相信习近平、王岐山他们这一些人要把反腐败进行到底的话，必须要清除刘云山的势力”。
6月10号，张英伟声称，“社科院”存在四大意识形态问题，已经遭到所谓“境外势力渗透”。这些极左言论，曾引起外界关注。而7月10号，中共喉舌引用“社科院”副院长赵胜轩的话说，“社科院” ，“凡出现政治违纪问题、不适宜担任现职的，一律予以免职。”
被视为中南海智囊的政治学者吴稼祥向媒体表示，中共党内派系斗争异常激烈，这是“社科院”设计陷害以习近平为首的“改革派”，让“改革派”背上“走资产阶级自由化”的罪名。
中国资深法学专家赵远明分析认为，下一个将要被削权者，很可能是刘云山，而宣传部门的控制权，将会被习近平阵营掌控。
中国资深法学专家赵远明：“从前面可以看出来，习近平是打算﹕第一，要把媒体多样化，你这样的话，媒体多样化，刘云山想控制也很难完全控制得了，第二的话，媒体多样化，打破这个传统的方式和传统的声音，要有新的因素参加进来，而且媒体多样化，有很多新人进来之后，会有更多新的思维，新的思想。”
不过，《澎湃新闻网》也没能走出“站在中共立场进行选择性报导”的怪圈。25号，《澎湃》选择性的刊登《经济学人》的封面特稿译文，把不利于中共宣传口径的文字整句删除，引来众多网民抨击。
采访编辑/李韵 后制/陈建铭
CCP Internally Fights Freedom Of Expression
The website of China-based The Paper launched a month ago.
Because it consistently exposes corrupt officials, recently,
it was criticized by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
(CASS).
They claimed The Paper doesn’t maintain a bottom line
and should be disciplined.
Commentators say that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
fight against rights of expression has intensified.
On Aug. 25, a CASS research center posted on their Weibo
(microblog): “Regarding The Paper’s series of improper
practices, the central leaders and relevant departments
timely issued serious criticism to correct it.
The criticism clearly requested all media follow the rule
of ‘one standard, open background and build
a strong bottom line.’
No exception allowed for any work unit.”
On Aug. 18, Chinese leader Xi Jinping asked that a new-style
media group with “diverse forms and advanced methods”
be formed.
The Paper’s website was regarded as one
of the examples cited by public.
Once CASS’s posts were published, discussion
among netizens was immediately triggered.
Many people said, “What does ‘The Paper’s series
of improper practices’ refer to”?
Whom is the “central leader and relevant departments”?
Sources say that The Paper is operated
by Shanghai’s Oriental Morning Post.
Since it launched on July 22, it became popular
for its exposure of corrupt officials’ inside stories.
It has a column called, “Story of Fighting Tiger,” which
reports dismissals of small and big “Tigers.”
Lu Wei, an officer in the central office, had been
to The Paper’s office for inspection work.
Liu Yinquan, US-based historian in Chinese history
says that this issue indicates that the struggle between
Xi Jinping and the Jiang faction has reached
its final moments.
Liu Yinquan: “I think CASS people who were against
The Paper are those who resisted Xi’s anti-corruption.
In other words, it was corrupt officials who
are against The Paper.
Furthermore, it was Jiang Zemin’s
corrupt officials’ counter attack.”
Sources say that Hou Huile, former Party secretary
of the CASS research center who publicized the news
regarding the criticism of the Paper.
He has always promoted anti-universal values.”
In the CCP’s Politburo, Liu Yunshan, who is in charge
of propaganda, had close links with CASS.
Zhang Yingwei, team leader of central disciplinary
department in CASS was said to be an ally of Liu Yunshan.
The both worked together for several years,
they were very close.
Liu Yinquan: “Liu Yunshan was in Jiang’s faction.
He is also very corrupt.
The media he controls are basically against
Xi Jinping and Wang Qishan.
We observed that he consistently created troubles.
I believe if Xi and Wang want to carry out anti-corruption
to the end, Liu Yunshan’s faction must be cleared out.”
On June 10, Zhang Yingwei claimed that CASS has four
major ideological problems and have been
“infiltrated by foreign forces.”
These extreme leftists have aroused public concern.
On July 10, CCP mouthpiece cited Zhao Shengxuan,
deputy president of CASS, who said that “those who have
violated disciplines and are unsuitable to currently
hold post will step down.”
Wu Jiaxiang, political scholar who was regarded as
a think tank of Zhongnanhai, says that the CCP
internal struggle is intensifying quite a bit,
and it is CASS that framed reformers led by Xi Jinping.
It is in order to let reformers take the “walking toward
bourgeoisie liberalization” blame.
Chinese senior legal expert Zhao Yuanming analyzes
that the next official to be purged could be Liu Yunshan.
The propaganda department will likely
be taken over by Xi Jinping.
Zhao Yuanming: “We observe what Xi Jinping intents to do:
First, diversifying media, in this case, even if Liu Yunshan
wants to control it, it will be difficult to control all.
Second, diversified media can break up
the traditional method and voices of propaganda.
There will be some new elements add in, and newcomers
will join and bring many new ideals and thoughts.”
However, The Paper still can’t excape from cycle
of “standing by the CCP’s side doing selective reporting.”
On Aug. 25, The Paper re-produced the Economists’ editorial.
The Paper deleted sentences that were not good for the CCP,
provoking many netizens’ criticisms.
Interview & Edit/LiYun Post-Production/Chen Jianming
