【新唐人2014年10月14日讯】日前，中共党媒推出美国是香港“占中”活动幕后黑手的说法，遭到美国国务院驳斥，认为这种指控“完全虚假”，试图转移事件焦点。分析指出，这是中共的一贯手法， 刻意抹黑民间诉求。
自香港和平占中运动开始以来，中共一直强调，运动是受到所谓的“外国势力煽动”的结果。10号，中共党媒《人民日报》刊文指称，美国一些非政府组织和智库，对香港“占领中环”运动，积极的出谋划策，对“占中”起到了推波助澜的作用。
文章说，据外媒报导，早在几个月前，美国国务院辖下的国家民主基金会（NED）负责人路易莎•格雷夫，就与“占中”的“灵魂人物”见面，讨论“占中”事宜。
《中国日报网》7号的一篇报导还说，美国政治智库Land Destroyer的一位研究员撰文指出，美国透过国家民主基金会，为“占中”出钱出力，因此主宰“占中”的，是华府和华尔街。
香港立法会议员何俊仁：“这是完全没有根据，是抹黑香港民间的民主运动，这个民主基金会从来在全球各地，包括香港，都有资助一些民间团体做一些普选的工作，包括有时安排一些人去美国考察，其实香港的建制派连同亲共的民建联也有收到这样的资助，钱也是不多，相比中共在香港的投资，根本是不可以相比，完全不成比例。”
而《中新网》也在3号发表“香港‘占中’十问”一文，其中第六问把矛头指向“占中”背后的西方势力，并把美国驻港总领馆官员丹•盖瑞特，称为是一个高级间谍。文章还说，设立于香港中文大学内的“香港美国中心”，是培训大学生成为“占中”骨干的基地。
原人民日报记者光远：“中共的官媒，一般它都不是实事求是的，因为它没有一个监督机制，这是第一，第二，你即便说是美国什么基金会、美国什么组织在支持占中，但是你光说不行啊，要拿出证据来，你没有依据，你光是说，很难取得公民的信任，或者是能蛊惑大家。”
针对中共官媒的抨击，美国国务院发言人哈夫11号发表声明强调，美国在香港“占中运动”中没有扮演任何角色，香港目前发生的事件只与港人有关，是香港民众自发表达争取真普选的诉求，其他任何说法，都是有意转移港人争取普选权利的视线焦点。
香港立法会议员叶建源：“香港的占中运动，肯定是一个自发为主的运动，大部分的民众是看到香港政府使用催泪弹，或者是民主方面的一些进展受到了很大的一个阻碍，才会出来。”
光远：“民众自发的，没有任何人来指使，指使这么多人，怎么指使，参加这种游行的，都是18岁以上的，都是成年人了，有自己的判断力，跟他的想法一样，他就参与了。”
英国《星期日泰晤士报》12号指出，香港特首梁振英涉嫌隐瞒曾收取澳大利亚工程公司5000万港元报酬的消息曝光后，中共更是认定，以美国为首的所谓西方阵营，试图搞乱香港。
何俊仁：“它们从来都是这样，89年六四屠杀之后，也是指责学生受到外国、连同美国背后在指使，你看，过了25年有什么证据，完全没有的，共产党总是编出一些谎言，抹黑它的对手，也为自己来个解说，他们从来不承认，自己的政策有很多错误，起到了人心背向。”
《中国数据时代》网站刊文指出，如果外国势力随便就能在香港煽动一场那么具牺牲性而且富有道德感召的民主运动，以中共的组织能力与资源财力，早就煽动全香港人认祖归宗、爱国爱党了﹔之所以做不到，是因为“煽动”必须以民众的价值信念为基础，不能与之抵触。这是“外国势力煽动”一说最大的漏洞。
采访/秦雪 编辑/陈洁 后制/葛雷
US Categorically Rejects Communist Accusation
he Communist mouthpiece recently launched an attack
against the US and referred to foreign interference in
Occupy Central.
The US State Department rejected such allegations as
completely false and a diversion of the focus.
Analysts indicate this is the usual practice of the Communist
regime to deliberately discredit civil appeals.
Since the beginning of Occupy movement, the CCP has claimed
the movement is backed by “foreign interferences".
People’s Daily criticized the NGO and think tank in the US have
manipulated and plotted the Occupy Central movement.
It said that, Louisa Greve, a director of the National Endowment
for Democracy of the US (NED), was already meeting with the
key people from “Occupy Central" several months ago,
to talk about the movement.
Accordingly, a Land Destroyer report indicated Washington
and Wall Street are directing the politicians and protest leaders
behind “Occupy Central" through the US State Department’s
National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
Hong Kong Legislative Council Albert Ho: “This is completely
unfounded.
It is to discredit the democratic movement in Hong Kong.
The NED has always funded civil societies in the world,
including Hong Kong, in the universal suffrage.
Sometimes people are arranged to visit the US.
In fact, both the pro-Beijing camp and the pro-Beijing DAB
(Democratic Alliance for Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong)
have received their funding as well. The money was not much.
Compared to what the CCP invested in Hong Kong,
it is completely out of proportion."
In its article regarding the 10 questions on Occupy Central,
China News pointed to the Western forces.
It identified an American author and researcher, Dan Garrett,
as a “flagrant spy" and referred to the Hong Kong-America Center
at the Chinese University of Hong Kong as the training base
for the student leaders in Occupy Central.
Former People’s Daily reporter Guang Yuan: “CCP’s official
media never seeks truth due to a lack of supervising mechanism
for one.
Second, even if they claimed the Occupy movement is funded
by some US organizations, where is the evidence?
Without any evidence, you can’t win the trust of the people.
It could confuse people, perhaps."
The US Department of State deputy spokesperson Harf stressed
on the daily press briefing that the State Department do not
have a role in this Occupy movement.
She said, “What is happening there is about the people of
Hong Kong, and any assertion otherwise is an attempt
to distract from the issue at hand."
Hong Kong Legislative Council Ip Kin-yuen: “The Occupy
Central is certainly a spontaneous movement.
Majority people came out because the Hong Kong Government
used tear gas, or realized democracy is greatly hindered."
Guang Yuan: “The people have spontaneously joined the
movement. How can so many people be instructed?
They are over 18 years of age, adults,
who have their own judgment and ideas."
The Sunday Times reported on the 12th, public ire towards
the chief executive has intensified after the exposure of CY Leung
being paid more than £4m in fees under a pre-existing contract
with the Australian engineering company UGL.
Beijing accuses US of a Hong Kong plot
and the “foreign interference" in Hong Kong.
Albert Ho: “It’s their routine. After the Tiananmen massacre
in 1989, the students were accused of being influenced and
instructed by foreign forces such as the US.
Look at it, it has been over 25 years and there is no evidence.
The Communist Party always made up some lie to discredit
its opponents and to explain its own deeds.
They would never admit their deeds have lost the support
of the people."
China Digital Times indicated that if foreign forces can indeed
incite a democratic movement of sacrificial and moral appeal,
the CCP’s organizational capacity and financial resources
would have had great appeal to the Hong Kongers who would
have returned to the mainland.
It has failed simply because the incitement must comply and
be consistent with the beliefs of the people.
This is one the biggest loopholes in the theory of
“inciting foreign forces."
Interview/QinXue Edit/ChenJie Post-Production/Gelei
