【新唐人2014年11月22日讯】在联合国决议将朝鲜最高领导人金正恩，以“反人类罪”送交国际刑事法庭后，朝鲜当局愤怒而激烈的迅速作出回应──不但发表声明驳斥联合国“政治挑衅”，还公开威胁将要实施新的核试验，以应对联合国决议。外界认为，这项获得111个联合国成员国支持的决议，将朝鲜当局的罪行曝光于世。
据《德国之声》援引朝鲜外务省11月20号发表的声明称，朝鲜将“全面拒绝”联合国大会刚刚通过的关于谴责朝鲜当局侵害人权的决议。朝鲜声明说，这项决议是“反朝决议”，是对朝鲜的“重大政治挑衅”。
此前在11月18号，联合国负责人权事务的第三委员会，首次通过有关朝鲜人权问题的决议，谴责朝鲜境内长期持续存在有系统、普遍和严重侵犯人权行为，决定将联合国朝鲜人权问题调查委员会的报告提交安理会，并要求将朝鲜最高领导人金正恩移交国际刑事法院审判。
这项由欧盟和日本共同起草，60个国家参与的决议草案，又被称作联合国史上规模最大的提案，得到了111个联合国成员国的投票支持，只有中国、俄罗斯、古巴以及叙利亚等19个国家投了反对票，55个国家弃权。
据了解，联合国这项决议预计下个月将提交给安理会。尽管决议得到了国际社会的广泛认可和支持，但美国《洛杉矶时报》18号指出，这一呼吁预计不会得到安理会的响应，因为中国和俄罗斯这两个拥有否决权的安理会常任理事国，反对追究朝鲜政府的法律责任。
对此，有国际人权组织发表声明，呼吁中、俄两国不要在安理会采取阻挠政策。
中国问题专家张健：“中国和俄罗斯在朝鲜的问题上，一直作为朝鲜幕后黑手出现的，它一直以来对朝鲜的这种‘力挺’，和在联合国这种百般阻挠对朝鲜的制裁，造成了朝鲜人每日处在水深火热之中，这是所有爱好和平的人不愿意看到的。”
然而，一向在人权问题上拒绝国际社会干涉和批评的朝鲜当局，对联合国的决议反应极为强烈。
据《朝中社》20号报导，朝鲜外务省发言人当天发表声明“强烈谴责”，称联合国这项决议草案是为了颠覆以“人民大众”为中心的社会主义制度。“朝鲜将再也不能克制新的核试验”，并“无限制地加强战争遏制力”。声明最后还宣称，决议造成的一切后果，都将由发起和支持决议的国家承担。
对此，外界普遍解读为这是朝鲜当局将要进行第四次核试验的威胁。
除朝鲜之外，中共喉舌媒体《环球时报》也刊文指责联合国要求审判金正恩的提议是“荒唐”和“极端”的做法。不过，外界对《环球时报》的这种口径和态度似乎已经习以为常。
张健：“中共和俄罗斯亚太战略需要来说，从对民主国家战略布局来说，它需要朝鲜这样一个无赖加流氓作为棋子的存在，这个棋子虽然有时‘不听话’，但是对于民主国家的要挟，还是能起到中共和俄罗斯满意的一个作用。”
安理会是否按照决议案要求，将朝鲜人权问题提交给国际刑事法庭，目前还不明确。不过《洛杉矶时报》指出，无论最后结果如何，如此大规模的决议，都起到了将朝鲜当局罪行曝光于世的作用。
美国纽约城市大学政治学教授夏明：“以前联合国委员会基本上是批评朝鲜政权，但是这次是把金正恩点名，就是认为金正恩自己负有个人的责任，就可能未来要审判金正恩，或者北朝鲜共产党政权垮台以后，金正恩要负个人责任。那么这也就做了铺垫。这也是一个历史的进步。”
美国纽约城市大学政治学教授夏明认为，在世界人权问题上，联合国通过这种决议，本身就具有很强的像征意义。
采访/陈汉 编辑/张天宇 后制/葛雷
Kim Jong-un May Face Trial. North Korea Threatens Nuclear Testing Again.
After the United Nations (UN) passed the resolution to send North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un to trial at the International Criminal Court on the charge of crimes against humanity, North Korea strongly responded with a statement. It not only refuted the UN’s “political provocation," but also threatened to launch new nuclear tests. Public opinion believes the resolution with 111 votes will expose the crimes of North Korea to the world.
On Nov. 20 North Korean Foreign Ministry stated it will fully reject the UN’s resolution that condemns North Korea for suppressing human rights. The statement called the resolution “slander against Pyongyang" and it’s a “grave political provocation."
On Nov. 18, the Third Committee of the UN in charge of human rights issues passed the resolution over North Korea. It condemned North Korea’s human rights issues for the first time; The domestic, long term, systematic, widespread and grave violations of human rights. The resolution was handed into the UN Security Council, to ask Kim Jong-un to stand trial at the international court.
The resolution drafted by the EU and Japan, with 60 countries involved, is called the biggest resolution in history. 111 UN member countries voted to support the resolution. China, Russia, Cuba, and Syria voted against the resolution, and 55 countries abstained.
The resolution is expected to be at the Security Council next month. Although the resolution received large scale of support from the international world, US Los Angeles Times reported on Nov. 18 that the Security Council may not react to it , because China and Russia are opposed to it. Both are permanent members of the Security Council with veto power.
International human rights NGO’s published a statement asking China and Russia to not obstruct the Security Council.
Zhang Jian, China issue expert, “China and Russia have always seemed North Korea’s dark hands behind the scene. Their ‘support’ of North Korea and obstruction of the UN’s sanction leads to the great misery of North Korean people. That’s what people who love peace don’t want to see."
North Korea has always rejected international interference and criticism, respondin strongly to the UN resolution.
According to Korean Central News Agency on Nov. 20, the North Korean Foreign Ministry strongly condemned the UN resolution, saying it’s purpose is to subvert the socialist system that “centered on the people." Such “aggression…is leaving us unable to further refrain from staging a new nuclear test" and its military deterrence “will be beefed up limitlessly," the statement says. It also stated that the resolution initiators and supporters will bear any consequences due to the resolution.
It’s widely interpreted that North Korean government is threatening to launch the 4th nuclear test.
Besides North Korea, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) media Global Times published an article, condemning the UN’s request to put Kim Jong-un on trial as “ridiculous" and “extreme." But the public is used to such tone and attitude from Global Times.
Zhang Jian: “In terms of Asia-Pacific strategy and strategic layout against democratic countries, China and Russia need North Korea, such a rogue, to be their chess piece. Even if the chess piece is disobedient at times, it can satisfy China and Russia’s need to threaten democratic countries."
It’s still unclear whether the Security Council will send the case to the International Criminal Court. Los Angeles Times says no matter what happens, a mass resolution is effectively exposing the crimes of North Korea.
.
Xia Ming, Political professor at City University of New York, “In the past, UN committee criticized the North Korean regime, but this time, it pointed out Kim Jong-un, meaning Kim is personally responsible for it. It’s possible that Kim will be on trial, or after the North Korean Communist party collapses, Kim will bear responsibility. So, the resolution is paving the road. It’s historical progress."
Xia Ming believes the UN using the resolution for human rights issues in the world has strong symbolic meaning.
Interview/ChenHan Edit/Zhang Tianyu Post-production/GeLei
