【新唐人2014年12月16日讯】中共机关刊物《求是》杂志的下属刊物《红旗文稿》，在今年第23期刊发了一篇所谓“阶段性研究成果”的文章。这篇文章对于微博等社交网络上“反党”言论，表达了危机感。尽管当局一直想方设法管制网络言论，但中国民众却越来越加紧思考的脚步。
《红旗文稿》这篇文章，题为“维护微博意识形态安全必须纠正的几种倾向”，是北京联合大学人文社科部的李艳艳，就北京市和中央拨款的两项科研项目发布的所谓“阶段性成果”。
文章开头就承认，否定中共领导和社会主义制度的观点在微博平台上扩张传播，对社会主义意识形态造成严重冲击。
中国网民对“普世价值”的认同程度，让文章表示非常担心，并说已经触及到了中共意识形态的根本。文章特别举了三个网路大V所谓“反党”的言论：例如今年3月28号，一条某知名经济学家的微博获得了超过400万人次的阅读量，博文中说“百年前共产主义风靡全球，多少热血青年为此抛头颅洒热血。可是经过百年的实践，证明此路不通”。
另外在今年9月4号，一位拥有2000多万“粉丝”的知名地产商人发布微博，直接抨击马克思是“洗脑”大众。
还有一位是拥有260多万“粉丝”的著名演员，在微博上公开质疑“没有共产党就没有新中国”，这名演员说“没谁都有中国”。
虽然文章没有直接点出三位微博大V的名字，但不少中国网友根据文中的信息，指出他们分别是在新浪微博拥有234万粉丝的著名经济学家茅于轼、有2778万粉丝的地产商任志强，和有282万粉丝的著名演员孙海英。
安徽异见人士沈良庆：“他这说的也是老实话啊，其实就是这种情况。因为你本身就不受欢迎么，你还不让人说话。它就这样，剥夺人家的表达自由。”
广州民主人士徐琳：“在我看起来是一种高级黑，就是哀鸣。我觉得这是好事情，她这样一说的话，让更多的人知道现在的舆论情况。”
文章一再提到了在西亚北非国家发生的“颜色革命”中，推特的作用，认为微博的传播功能和效力不能低估。
中共对意识形态的危机感，和网络言论可能引发“颜色革命”的警惕，近期还不止在这一篇文章中体现出来。
中共鹰派少将罗援，10月份在《经济导刊》举办的研讨会发言中，提到“舆论阵地失守”已经成为一大问题，他说：“现在一些网站上，你不骂共产党，不骂毛泽东，都不好意思上这个网。”
罗援也提到“颜色革命”，并形容在网络批评中共和现行制度的人，今后就是“颜色革命”的基础。
原《河北人民广播电台》编辑朱欣欣：“反映出共产党确实是民心丧尽，他们在舆论上也知道不占优势，尽管他们控制了一些所谓的媒体，把很多声音都压制住了，但他也知道，真实的声音、状态是改变不了的。”
这种危机感使得当局在近几年中，对网络社交平台，和新媒体的管制越来越严厉，试图把民间“反党”的声音最小化。
中国民间维权非政府组织“民生观察”负责人 刘飞跃：“甚至像官方的，门户网站，像网易，它的微博都不得不取消了。另外最近不是对网络跟帖吗？连跟帖也不放过了，也要审查。中国的网络自由度下降是不争的事实。”
尽管当局仍然将“反党”这个敏感词视为“大逆不道”，但是在民间，它已经不再是一个禁词。
徐琳：“难道不能反的吗？有意见就可以提，觉得它不好，就可以批评它。认为它不好，就可以要求它下台，这个是正常的一个现象么。”
安徽异见人士沈良庆指出，实际上，真正的民怨，比起受到官方批评的微博上大V的言论，还要强大的多。然而当局连善意的提醒都不能容忍，正在扼杀最后一点空间。
采访/田净 编辑/尚燕 后制/钟元
Communist Mouthpiece Opposes Anti-Party
The 23rd issue of the Party bi-monthly, Qiushi,
discussed current Party research achievements.
In particular, it illustrated a so-called crisis,
the anti-party phenomenon on Internet posts.
Despite the online censorship, mainlanders are getting
increasingly expressive in their thoughts and ideas.
Published by Li Yanyan from the Department of Social Sciences
at the Beijing Union University, the research was a central and
municipal funded project.
The article was entitled, “The Several Tendencies That Must Be
Corrected to Maintain Microblogging Ideological Security."
The article admitted that online posts of negative views
on the CCP leadership have had a severe impact
on socialist ideology.
The article expressed, Chinese netizens’ identification
of universal values has affected the CCP’s fundamental ideology.
It specifically took three influential Chinese bloggers’
anti-party remarks as examples.
On March 28, an economist’s blog stated, “Communism was
so popular a century ago that numerous passionate young people
were willing to shed their blood for it.
However, a century’s practical experience has proved it
to be a dead end."
This blog attracted more than 4 million online readers.
On Sept. 4, a real estate businessman with over 20 million fans
bluntly criticized online that, Marxism “brainwashes" the public.
An actor with more than 2.6 million online fans openly
challenged the so-called “Without the CCP, there would be
no new China."
The actor commented, “With or without, China will still be there."
Though the article didn’t directly name the three big Chinese
bloggers, Chinese netizens have identified them as economist
Mao Yushi, realtor Ren Zhiqiang and actor Sun Haiying,
who have 2.34 million fans, 27.78 million fans,
and 2.82 million fans on Sina Weibo, respectively,
These posts have been deleted but still traceable
on the Internet outside of China.
Shen Liangqing, a dissident in Anhui Province: “What was said
was actually the truth. They don’t even allow others to comment.
It deprives people of freedom of expression."
Xu Lin, a democracy activist in Guangzhou: “In my view,
it’s a super whining. I think this is good.
Her publication in fact made people realize
the current situation of public opinion."
The article mentioned repeatedly the role of Twitter in the
“Color Revolution" occurring in West Asia and North Africa.
It warned not to underestimate the function and effect
of online posts.
The CCP’s sense of ideological crisis and the concern
of “Color Revolution" triggered by online speeches
are recently also seen in other publications.
Chinese hawk Major General Luo Yuan acknowledged
“the loss of the public opinion battlefield" in a seminar
held by the Economic Herald magazine in October.
He said: “Nowadays, on some websites, if you don’t criticize
the CCP or Mao Zedong, you would be afraid of visiting
the websites.”
Luo Yuan also mentioned the “Color Revolution."
He described those who criticized the CCP and the regime
are the foundation of the “color revolution" in the future.
Zhu Xinxin, former editor of the Hebei People’s Radio:
“It shows that the CCP has certainly lost people’s confidence.
They do know that they haven’t got the advantage in terms
of public opinion.
Though they control some of the so-called media,
and have suppressed many voices,
they also know that the true voice will never be changed."
This sense of crisis has caused even tighter and stringent online
censorship, trying to minimize “anti-party" voices.
Liu Feiyue, organizer of Chinese civil rights NGO
“Livelihood Watch: “Even official portals, such as the Netease,
have had to cancel their microblogging services.
In addition, even the popular online follow-up comments
are no exception. They are subject to censorship as well.
It is an indisputable fact that China’s Internet freedom
is declining."
The regime continues regarding “anti-party" as “outrageous,"
despite its popularity among the general public.
Xu Lin: “Don’t we have the right to have opposite opinions?
As long as we have different opinions, we should speak them up,
and criticize them.
As long as we think someone is not good,
we can ask him to step down.
This should be a normal phenomenon."
Shen Qingliang pointed out that, in fact, the real grievances
among the general public are stronger than the online posts.
Even these gentle reminders cannot be tolerated by
the authorities.
Apparently, the last outlet is being blocked.
Interview/TianJing Edit/ShangYan Post-Production/ZhongYuan
