【新唐人2015年01月16日讯】香港特首梁振英14号宣读自“雨伞运动”后的首份施政报告，批评“香港大学”学生会刊物《学苑》主张香港“自立自决”，是错误的“港独”。评论认为，梁振英这是“上纲上线”，以学生支持“港独”为借口“搞批斗”，打压言论，并向北京效忠。
1月14号，梁振英施政报告中点名狠批“香港大学”的两份书刊，去年2月《学苑》出版的专题“香港民族命运自决”，以及去年9月份编印的“香港民族论”中，主张香港“寻找一条自立自决的出路”。梁振英声称对《学苑》和占中学生领袖的“错误主张”，“不能不警惕”。
当天下午梁振英还在记者会上，当着众多记者的面，翻阅《学苑》和《民族论》，他不满文章中“讲到香港独立”，“民主回归论死亡，香港民主独立应运而生，是将香港独立诉求和争取民主连成一线……”等内容。
梁振英认为，文章中“有关主张香港独立的言论，不是学术研究”，而是涉及香港关键的宪制问题，所以“港独”问题需要警惕。
香港自由撰稿人张成觉认为，梁振英这是“上纲上线”，误导世人。
香港自由撰稿人张成觉：“梁振英在施政报告里，他这一点是很含糊的，有一点容易误导市民，误导群众，那么再说回《学苑》这个文章，他是主张香港105自立和自决，是说香港人本身的利益，应该是香港市民自行去维护和判断，不应该由外面的势力来越俎代庖，跟港独完全两个概念。”
香港学联秘书长周永康批评，梁振英对《学苑》的言论是“搞批斗”，对学生刊物疑神疑鬼，“再次证明梁振英思想极端……连大学校院的学生言论都想杀无赦”。周永康说自己曾提出“香港问题，香港解决”的口号，只是捍卫香港人认同的“一国两制”的运行方式。
曾担任 2013－2014年度《学苑》总编辑的梁继平，回应说，梁振英故意给港大学生会扣“港独”帽子，是践踏“言论自由”的举动。梁继平说，《学苑》刊登的文章，只是希望引发学生思考，呼吁港人摆脱奴性。
2013－2014年度香港大学学生会《学苑》总编辑梁继平：004“很多文章都很有理据，或者深入分析香港自己的历史、文化，香港人的公民身份，或者政治意识等等，去塑造我们近年少见的，相对有主体性论述的香港人的身份。”
梁继平表示，现在香港年轻人，有“港独”意识的并不多，学生只是要求撤回人大8.31决定和公民提名等，希望争取民主公义制度，并非错误主张。
学民思潮召集人黄之锋说，学民思潮无意推动“港独”，《学苑》的言论只供社会讨论。黄之锋质疑梁振英的做法是要以言入罪，他表示，特区政府应该反思，为何愈来愈多人对特区及中央政府不信任，令“港独”意识抬头。
70年代曾担任《学苑》副总编辑的程翔指出，在任何一个社会里，年轻人的思想都是比较前卫的，梁振英不管赞不赞同他们的观点，都不应该在施政报告中批判他们。
《学苑》原副总编辑程翔：“成年人如果不接受这种东西的话，你跟他辩论，你跟他劝导，而不是去扼杀他，如果一个社会对最前卫的思想都给扼杀，那社会就没有生机，没有活力。所以我觉得梁振英这样做是扼杀香港年轻一代勇于探索的精神，我觉得是非常不对的。”
张成觉分析，“雨伞运动”的核心议题是特首普选，梁振英在施政报告中，没有反思学生“争普选”背后的政治问题，而是碰触“港独”这个敏感议题，出乎很多人的意料。
张成觉：455“梁振英作为中共钦点的特区行政长官，他在占中之后，目前这个情况下，他对于学院这个刊物不能视而不见的，或者是西环的中联办授意让他这么办，或者是他利益熏心，觉得这里面对他的地位构成威胁，他一定要撇清这个关系。”
张成觉分析，北京向来以有香港人支持“港独”为借口，强硬推行对港政策，梁振英这次提“港独”，可以看作是撇清自己，讨好北京的一种宣誓。
采访编辑/李韵
Leung Chun-ying’s Criticism of Hong Kong Student Magazine
Similar to Denouncement During Cultural Revolution.
On Jan. 14, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying read his first
administrative report since the “Umbrella Movement."
He criticized University of Hong Kong student publication
“Undergrad" for its support of Hong Kong autonomy.
It was labeled as wrongful support of “Independence."
Commentators think Leung exaggerated students’ ideas.
He was trying to find excuses to suppress students
using “Independence of Hong Kong “.
Leung was also trying to show his allegiance to Beijing.
Leung Chun-ying severely criticized two magazines
from the University of Hong Kong.
In Feb. 2014, Undergrad published a special report titled
Hong Kong Nation’s Self Determination.
Another article was in Hong Kong Nation Discussion
published in Sep. 2014.
This advocates Hong Kong “finding a way out of
self-sustaining and self-determination."
Leung claimed “we must be vigilant" to the “wrong ideology"
of Undergrad and leaders of the Occupy Central movement.
At the press conference, Leung browsed through Undergrad
and Hong Kong Nation Discussion watched by reporters.
He was dissatisfied with the articles saying “talking about
Hong Kong independence"; and
“The death of democracy and the birth of of
Hong Kong Independence."
Leung Chun-ying believes that “Remarks of Hong Kong
independence were not just academic speech".
They touched key constitutional issues, so they need to be
on alert over “Hong Kong Independence".
Hong Kong free-lance writer Andrei Chang thinks Leung was
labeling names of student actions and misleading people.
Andrei Chang: “There is one confusing point in
Leung Chun-ying’s report, which is misleading.
Taking the article in Undergrad, Hong Kong’s self-sustaining
and self-determination were about Hong Kong citizens.
The people should decide what they want,
not the outside power.
It is totally different from Hong Kong Independence."
2013 – 2014 Undergrad General Editor Brian Leung
said that Leung Chun-ying was trying to label the names
of “Hong Kong Independence" to students. He is damaging
freedom of speech.
Brian Leung said that articles on Undergrad were to make
people think.
They were appealing to Hong Kong people to cleanse
their nature of being slaves.
Hong Kong Federation Secretary General Alex Chou
criticized Mr Leung’s remarks on Undergrad .
He said they were similar to the denouncement during
the Cultural Revolution.
“It confirms Leung’s extreme ideas…
curb students’ freedom of speech."
Alex Chou said he once raised the slogan “Hong Kong
Issues Resolved by Hong Kong People".
This is the “One Country, Two System"
acknowledged by Hong Kong people.
Brian Leung, “Many articles come from in-depth analysis of
Hong Kong’s history, culture, people and political awareness.
They are to shape the Hong Kong identification,
which was rare in recent years."
Brian Leung expressed that not many young men in Hong
Kong have the thought of “Hong Kong’s Independence".
Students just want the 8.31 decision by
the NPR to be withdrawn.
They want to have a democratic system. That is not wrong.
Scholarism founder Joshua Wong said Scholarism has
no intention to promote Hong Kong Independence.
The remards on Undergrad are only for people to discuss.
Wong questioned Leung’s way of
labeling crimes over speech.
He said the SAR government should think over why
so many people mistrust the central government.
Why is there a start of Hong Kong Independence?
Ching Cheong, who was deputy editor of Undergrad in the
70’s pointed said young peoples’ ideas are more avant-garde.
Whether Mr. Leung agrees or disagrees with them, he
should not criticize them in his administrative report.
Ching Cheong, “If adults do not accept these kind of ideas,
they can discuss or guide them, not strangle them.
If the most avant-garde ideas of a society are suppressed,
then there is no life in the society.
I think it is very wrong that Leung was strangling
young peoples’ spirit of change."
Andrei Chang analyzed that the core issue of the “Umbrella
Movement" is the universal suffrage of the Chief Executive.
Leung Chun-ying did not reflect political issues behind the
students’ fight over elections in his report.
He touched upon the sensitive topic of “Hong Kong
Independence". This was out of many peoples’ expectations.
Andrei Chang: “Mr Leung is the Chief Executive appointed
by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
After the Occupy Central movement, he cannot ignore
these magazines.
It is either he was told to do so, or he felt it would threaten
his positions and he must distance themselves from this."
Andrei Chang thinks Beijing has always used the excuse
of “Hong Kong independence" to push its policies.
Leung Chun-ying mentioned “Hong Kong independence"
to distance himself from it and get favor from Beijing.
Interview & Edit/Li Yun
