【新唐人2012年3月19日讯】薄熙来被免职后，无论是官方还是民间，以及海内外舆论都普遍倾向支持或庆祝薄熙来下台。但北大教授孔庆东却大反其道，在大陆电视节目公开为薄熙来站台，大呼罢免薄熙来是“反革命政变”，矛头直指党中央，相当于公开挑战胡温，如此张狂令外界愕然。有评论认为，这显示胡温倒薄后，以孔庆东代言的左派势力进行大力反扑，高层内斗仍然纠缠不休，火药味十足。
前重庆市委书记薄熙来被免职后的仅仅几个小时，左派代表人物之一，“北京大学”教授孔庆东在3月15号晚间的第1视频新闻网的节目上高调亮相，公开质问观众“你为薄熙来做了什么？”孔庆东还声称：“让打黑英雄受委屈了，那不是公开的发动反革命政变嘛！”，因此煽动“大家都起来和黑暗作斗争”。
孔庆东这段疯狂言论被网友评论为“如此猖狂前所未有”。
《纽约时报》研究员赵岩：“他这个叫嚣的语言和思想对现在弱势群体有一定的迷惑作用，我们经常讲，什么叫蛊惑人心啊，妖言惑众啊，孔庆东这种言论，和司马南这种言论就叫蛊惑人心，就叫妖言惑众，就是妖言，没有别的词形容他们俩。”
也有网友说，薄是最有野心与杀人不眨眼的侩子手式的红色野心家，中国绝对不能陷入薄熙来所愿望的红色海洋中，“文革式的红色恐怖”绝对不能重演。
《纽约时报》研究员赵岩指出，就是因为在文革以后没有彻底否定毛泽东的红色专政思想，才会出现今天薄熙来所谓的唱红与复辟。
《纽约时报》研究员赵岩：“你利用所有的媒体，来主张回到到毛泽东时代，那不是让中国人民从文革当中，有这么一句话，叫做让中国人民重受二茬罪嘛，是不是？ 有的人主张回到毛泽东时代，回到那种所谓的计划经济时代，那么在西部给他开一个毛泽东思想的大学校，让他一个月吃半斤肉，二两油，三个馍，他愿不愿意去，我想别说孔庆东，司马南，中国没有一个人愿意去的，所以说这种话，主张回到毛泽东时代的人，都是骗人的。”
大陆诗人和文化评论家叶匡政认为，显然孔庆东的背后有极左政治势力在撑腰，否则这样一个政治文人是不敢如此疯狂的。
叶匡政︰“这说明他（孔庆东）背后有一个比较强硬的势力在支持他，而且我对第1视频网站也感到奇怪，因为显然罢免薄熙来是一个集体决定，也就是按照中国媒体的这种规则的话，是没有人敢反对这个举动的，无论第1视频网站敢播这种内容，包括孔庆东敢说这些内容，不就说明他们背后应该是有一个非常强硬的政治势力，而且这股政治势力是反对罢免薄熙来的。”
除了《人民日报》，《央视》等中共喉舌媒体之外，还有一些网站也受不同派的政治势力所控制，如《独家网》和《四月网》等后台据传就是极左政治势力。
叶匡政指出，大陆媒体敢于发布孔庆东这类疯狂言论，除非不想活了，否则的话就是为某派政治势力高调代言。因此这也说明，在罢免薄熙来这个问题上，中共高层仍然在继续博弈，内斗还在持续。
采访/刘惠 编辑/许旻 后制/孙宁
Upon learning that the Governor of Calif. was coming to visit,
Leftists Fighting Back: Kong Qingdong Challenges Hu&Wen.
Since Bo Xilai was discharged from his position, Chinese
officials, ordinary people and public opinion all supports or even celebrate this decision.
However, Kong Qingdong, Professor from
Peking University, has acted in opposition.
He openly supported Bo Xilai in a TV show. He claimed
that discharging Bo Xilai is a “counter-revolutionary plot”.
Kong pointed his finger directly at the Central Committee
of CCP, openly challenging the Hu&Wen regime.
His aggressive boldness has astonished the public. Some
analysts think “left forces” are vigorously fighting back.
Kong Qingdong is just the speaker of the “left forces”. The
fierce fighting between all CCP senior factions is entangled.
Kong Qingdong, Professor of Peking University,
is a representative of “leftist forces”.
Only a couple hours after Bo Xilai was discharged as CCP
secretary of Chongqing City, Kong reacted.
On the evening of March 15, Kong showed up in an internet
program called ‘No1 Video News’.
He questioned the public “what have you done for Bo Xilai”.
Kong claimed: “Treating the hero of cracking down on
gangsters unjustly is nothing but an anti-revolution plot!”
Kong agitated the public “to fight against dark forces in China.”
Netizens reacted towards Kong as “unprecedentedly bold”
and “wasn’t he drunk?”
New York Times analyst Zhao Yan responded.
“Kong’s agitating words and thoughts are somewhat
misleading to the disadvantaged groups in China.
We often talk about “spreading rumors to deceive
and mislead people”.
That’s exactly what Kong Qingdong
and Sima Nan have been doing.
The words out of the mouth of Kong
are fallacies to mislead the public.
Netizens also said that Bo is the most ambitious person of all.
Bo won’t hesitate a second when he kills an innocent person.
China should never go back to the “red” time as Bo wished.
The “red” terror similar to the “Big Cultural Revolution”
should never be in China again.
Zhao Yan pointed out that because Mao Zedong’s ‘red’
dictatorship wasn’t rejected completely, Bo tries to follow suit.
Bo advocated singing ‘red’ songs and tried to take power.
Zhao Yan: “Bo made use of all media to advocate going back
to Mao Zedong’s time.
He’s trying to put people back to the time
of Big Cultural Revolution, isn’t he?
Thus, Chinese people would suffer the pain from
the Big Cultural Revolution all over again?
Some people advocate going back to Mao’s time
and going back to the time of a planned economy.
Those people should be sent to western China where
a school advocating Mao’s thought can be built.
With the planned economy, the person can only have half
a pound of pork, 0.3 pound oil and three buns a month.
I don’t think those people are willing to go there.
Without mentioning Kong Qingdong and Sima Nan,
nobody in China is willing to go there.
Therefore, whoever advocates going back
to Mao’s time is deceiving people.”
Ye Kuangzheng, poet and cultural critic, thinks that
it’s obvious leftist forces are behind Kong.
Otherwise, a political scholar wouldn’t
be this aggressively bold.
Ye Kuangzheng: “This shows that some forces with power
are behind Kong. No1 Video News website also seems strange.
Since discharging Bo is a consensus, there should be no
voice of objection according to Chinese media regulations.
No1 Video News website dares air Kong and Kong dares
speak out with those bold comments.
All those facts prove that there are some powerful political
forces behind them. Those political forces object to discharging Bo Xilai. ”
In addition to CCP official media, “People’s Daily”, “CCTV”
etc, there are some websites controlled by different factions of CCP political forces.
For example, it was said that “Exclusive Network”
and “April Net” belong to “leftist forces”.
Ye Kuangzheng pointed out that the media that dare publish
Kong’s crazy comments are courting death.
If not, the media are speaking for some high profile
political forces.
It shows that the CCP senior authorities are still fighting
with each other on the Bo issue.
